Journal of Information Resources Management ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6): 17-30.doi: 10.13365/j.jirm.2024.06.017

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Measuring the Academic Value of Scientific Papers by Integrating Innovation and Recognition—A Case Study in the Field of Artificial Intelligence

Wu Jiachun1 Dong Ke1,2 Chen Xingyuan1 Chen Lifang1 Sun Jiaming1   

  1. 1.Research Institute for Data Management & Innovation, Nanjing University, Suzhou, 215163; 
    2. School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023
  • Online:2024-11-26 Published:2024-12-19
  • About author:Wu Jiachun(corresponding author), Ph.D. candidate, with research interests in knowledge innovation and information measurement, Email: hdu_wjc@163.com; Dong Ke, Ph.D., research fellow, tenured associate professor, doctoral supervisor, with research interests in informetrics and evaluation; Chen Xingyuan, postgraduate, with research interests in informetrics and evaluation; Chen Lifang, postgraduate, with research interests in informetrics and evaluation; Sun Jiaming, postgraduate, with research interests in informetrics and evaluation.
  • Supported by:
    This is an outcome of the project "Research on Measuring the Academic Value of Scientific Research Papers for Representative Work Evaluation"(21CTQ017) supported by the National Foundation for Social Sciences.

Abstract: The full text of papers and their citation relationships convey a significant amount of academic information, which helps characterize the connotation of academic value and improve the precision of value assessment. This study builds a new evaluation index of academic value based on the epistemology of value, integrating the factual knowledge based on the papers themselves with the contingent knowledge based on external citations, and selecting papers in the field of artificial intelligence from the Web of Science database from 1990 to 2021 as the experimental data. Compared with traditional metrics, the academic value measurement proposed in this study comprehensively considers the value of internal innovation(represented by innovativeness), external recognition value(based on citation sentiment, citation intensity, and citation similarity). The results showed that:(1) value of internal innovation was not correlated with either the number of citations or the number of mentions;(2) value of external recognition was positively correlated with the number of mentions but not significantly correlated with the number of citations;(3) and academic value was positively correlated with the number of mentions, value of internal innovation, and value of external recognition, although value of external recognition was not significantly correlated with value of internal innovation. The results revealed that the impact indicator based on the number of citations has a lag and is insufficient to reflect the paper’s innovation. Compared to citation counts, the number of mentions, incorporating citation preference, shows slight improvement in measuring value of external recognition. The academic value measure proposed in this study has certain advantages in integrating the internal and external values of the paper and reflecting comprehensive academic value.

Key words: Academic value, Value of internal innovation, Value of external recognition, Evaluation indicators, Scientific evaluation

CLC Number: