社会科学发展的路径选择：遵循抑或偏离比较优势

doi:10.13365/j.jirm.2026.02.154

信息资源管理学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (2): 154-165.doi: 10.13365/j.jirm.2026.02.154

社会科学发展的路径选择：遵循抑或偏离比较优势

罗润东¹　蔡若楠¹　田文灿^2,3　陈悦⁴

1.山东大学商学院，威海，264209；　
2.北京师范大学计算传播学研究中心，珠海，519085；　
3.北京师范大学新闻传播学院，北京，100875；　
4.大连理工大学科学学与科技管理研究所暨WISE实验室，大连，116024

出版日期:2026-03-26 发布日期:2026-06-04
作者简介:罗润东，教授，博士，博士生导师，研究方向为科学经济学；蔡若楠（通讯作者），博士研究生，研究方向为科学经济学，Email：cairuonan@mail.sdu.edu.cn；田文灿，讲师，博士，硕士生导师，研究方向为科学计量与信息计量；陈悦，教授，博士，博士生导师，研究方向为科学学。
基金资助:
本文系国家社科基金重大项目“ 我国社会科学国际影响力评估与学术话语权建设研究” （22&ZD194）研究成果之一。

The Pathways of Social Science Development: Following or Diverging from Revealed Comparative Advantage

Luo Rundong¹　Cai Ruonan¹　Tian Wencan^2,3　Chen Yue⁴

1.School of Business, Shandong University, Weihai, 264209；　
2.Center for Computational Communication Research, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai, 519085；　
3.School of Journalism and Communication, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875；　
4.WISE Lab, Institute of Science of Science and S&T Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024

Online:2026-03-26 Published:2026-06-04
About author:Luo Rundong, professor, Ph.D., doctoral supervisor, research interests including economics of science; Cai Ruonan (corresponding author), Ph.D. candidate, research interests including economics of science, Email: cairuonan@mail.sdu.edu.cn; Tian Wencan, lecturer, Ph.D., master's supervisor, research interests including scientometrics and informetrics; Chen Yue, professor, Ph.D., doctoral supervisor, research interests including science of science.
Supported by:
This research is supported by the Major Project of the National Social Science Fund of China "Evaluation of the International Influence of China's Social Sciences and the Construction of Academic Discourse Power"(22&ZD194).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于长周期、大规模的学术成果发表数据，从比较优势视角探究全球社会科学的发展路径，为探索科学发展规律提供了新的理论视角，也为我国构建社会科学的学术话语权体系提供了科学依据。本研究借鉴比较优势与产品空间理论，利用全球各国在2001—2022年间于Web of Science数据库发表的380万余篇SSCI论文数据，量化全球各国的学科比较优势及学科密度，实证探索全球社会科学发展的路径，在此基础上，进一步分析中国社会科学在省域层面的学科布局。结果表明，全球社会科学的发展路径遵循比较优势，在改变计数规则和采用论文层面的被引频次、期刊层面的影响因子和学科层面的h指数对论文质量进行控制后，结果仍保持稳健；中国社会科学省域层面的优势学科分布具有明显的空间集聚现象，主要分布于京津冀、长三角和川渝圈；各省域的潜在比较优势的学科分布具有明显差异。

关键词: 社会科学, 发展路径, 学术话语权, 比较优势, 路径选择, 学科布局

Abstract: Based on long-term and large-scale academic publication data, this study explored the developmental paths of global social sciences from the perspective of revealed comparative advantage, offering a new theoretical lens for exploring the laws of scientific development and providing a robust scientific basis for strengthening China's academic discourse power in the social sciences. This study applies revealed comparative advantage and product space theories, using data from over 3.8 million SSCI papers published by countries worldwide in the Web of Science database from 2001 to 2022. We quantify the revealed comparative advantage and disciplinary density of global social sciences and empirically examine the development paths of these disciplines. Additionally, we analyze the provincial-level disciplinary distribution of China’s social sciences. The results reveal that global social sciences exhibit inequality, although this inequality has declined over time. Furthermore, the development paths of social sciences align with the principle of revealed comparative advantage. After adjusting for counting rules and controlling for paper quality using article-level citation frequency, journal-level impact factors, and discipline-level h-index, the results remain robust. Moreover, social sciences at the provincial level in China show clear spatial concentration, with dominant disciplines primarily located in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, the Yangtze River Delta, the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area, and the Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle. Significant regional differences are observed in the distribution of disciplines with potential revealed comparative advantage.

Key words: Social sciences, Developmental pathway, Academic discourse power, Revealed comparative advantage, Path selection, Disciplinary layout

中图分类号:

G301

罗润东　蔡若楠　田文灿　陈悦. 社会科学发展的路径选择：遵循抑或偏离比较优势[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2026, 16(2): 154-165.

Luo Rundong　Cai Ruonan　Tian Wencan　Chen Yue. The Pathways of Social Science Development: Following or Diverging from Revealed Comparative Advantage[J]. Journal of Information Resources Management, 2026, 16(2): 154-165.

[1]	李梦茹　金学慧　孙若丹　孟潇. 社会科学研究的政策影响力：基本理论模型及评价实践[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2022, 12(1): 91-100.
[2]	黄　萃　杨　超. “计算社会科学”与 “社会计算”概念辨析与研究热点比较分析[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2020, 10(6): 4-19.
[3]	张　莹　戚景琳　孙玉伟. 管理学科研人员数据复用行为特征探析[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2020, 10(4): 79-87.
[4]	刘存地. 认知偏差与突破路径：炒作高峰期后的大数据与社会研究[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2020, 10(2): 37-47.
[5]	郭哲敏. 新时代文献资源共享创新模式探索——国家哲学社会科学文献中心的资源建设与服务优化[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2019, 9(1): 114-121.
[6]	徐晴. 基于CSSCI来源期刊的我国LIS学科研究领域及其演化分析[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2016, 6(4): 101-108.
[7]	冉从敬　刘琬. 知识图谱在我国人文社科领域的研究进展[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2014, 4(1): 4-13.

社会科学发展的路径选择：遵循抑或偏离比较优势

The Pathways of Social Science Development: Following or Diverging from Revealed Comparative Advantage

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价