信息资源管理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2): 123-137.doi: 10.13365/j.jirm.2022.02.123

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于贡献要素的iSchools院校科研合作模式探究

杨思洛1,2 张凌霄3   

  1. 1.武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉,430072; 
    2.武汉大学中国科学评价研究中心,武汉,430072;
    3.江苏省档案馆,南京,210008
  • 出版日期:2022-03-26 发布日期:2022-04-25
  • 作者简介:杨思洛,博士,教授,研究方向为文献计量与科学评价,Email: 58605025@qq.com;张凌霄,硕士生,研究方向为文献计量与科学评价。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社科基金重大项目“基于大数据的科教评价信息云平台构建和智能服务研究”(19ZDA348)阶段性成果。

A Study on Research Co-authorship Pattern of the iSchools Based on Author Contribution Elements

Yang Siluo1,2 Zhang Lingxiao3   

  1. 1.School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072; 
    2.Research Center for Chinese Science Evaluation, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072; 
    3.Jiangsu Provincial Archives, Nanjing, 210008
  • Online:2022-03-26 Published:2022-04-25

摘要: 科研合著是科学合作的重要方式,以人、信息、技术的交叉领域为中心的iSchools联盟是目前图书情报学科发展的主流。通过分析iSchools成员院校的科研合著模式,对于系统了解图书情报领域的科研合作特征具有重要意义。本文基于Web of Science数据库中22所iSchools院校的文献数据,综合利用文献计量和社会网络分析方法,结合合著强度和贡献要素,从院校间和院校整体两个角度,探究iSchools院校科研合作模式。研究发现:①iSchools院校的整体合著程度和整体合著广度普遍较高,但iSchools院校间的合著并不是iSchools院校合著的主体,并且合著程度上院校间差距明显;②2010—2014年至2015—2019年,iSchools院校间合著网络的演化非常显著,合著结构更加均匀,广度和强度明显提升,合著研究主题的跨学科性与前沿性都非常明显,并且合著对象具有流动变化性;③基于贡献要素的iSchools院校的科研合著模式各有特色,主要形成了实质性贡献模式、领导性贡献模式、辅助性贡献模式、建议性贡献模式。

关键词: iSchools, 科研合著, 作者贡献要素, 社会网络分析, 科学合作模式

Abstract: Research co-authorship is an important way of scientific collaboration. iSchool members are world’s top information schools. Exploring the research co-authorship among iSchool members is of great significance to fully understand the research collaboration in library and information field. Based on the paper of 22 iSchools indexed by Web of Science, this study used scientometrics method, social network analysis and author contribution elements to explore the internal collaboration pattern and overall collaboration pattern of iSchools. The research found: a) The overall collaboration degree and collaboration amplitude of these 22 iSchools are generally high, but the internal collaboration among the 22 iSchools doesn’t make up the main part of their overall research collaboration and there is a gap between the 22 iSchools with regard to collaboration degree. b) From 2010-2014 to 2015-2019, the structure of internal collaboration is more uniform, the breadth and intensity of the internal collaboration has been significantly improved, the main collaboration institution of iSchools changed with the growth of time. c) The research pattern based on author contribution elements of iSchools varied, with four main types: substantive contribution pattern, leadership contribution pattern, supporting contribution pattern and advising contribution pattern.

Key words: iSchools, Research co-authorship, Author contribution element, Social network analysis, Scientific cooperation

中图分类号: