信息资源管理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (5): 73-83.doi: 10.13365/j.jirm.2021.05.073

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国数字包容政策分析与对策研究——基于政策工具视角

曾刚1 邓胜利2   

  1. 1.武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉,430072;
    2. 武汉大学信息资源研究中心, 武汉,430072
  • 出版日期:2021-09-26 发布日期:2021-11-11
  • 作者简介:曾刚,博士生,研究方向为信息管理研究;邓胜利,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为用户行为与服务,Email:41105862@qq.com。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系武汉大学“人工智能问题‘融通研究专项课题’人工智能应用与个人信息保护研究”(2020AI021)研究成果之一。

China’s Digital Inclusion Policy Analysis and Countermeasure Research: Based on the Perspective of Policy Tools

Zeng Gang1 Deng Shengli2   

  1. 1.School of Information Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan,430072;
    2.Center for Studies of Information Resources, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072
  • Online:2021-09-26 Published:2021-11-11

摘要: 随着信息技术的飞速发展,数字基础设施建设不断推进,在给人们带来更多便利的同时也带来了“数字鸿沟”问题。为促进信息弱势群体的数字平等,政府颁布了多部政策法规。本文以筛选的103份数字包容相关政策文献为研究样本,以政策工具作为研究理论与依据,对103份样本进行内容编码、统计与分析。研究结果表明,我国数字包容相关政策存在政策可操作性有待增强、环境型政策工具使用过溢、供给型与需求型政策工具结构失衡、数字包容政策前瞻性较差等不足,据此提出完善政策实施细则、优化政策工具结构、建立协同治理政策体系等建议,为未来的政策制定提供参考。

关键词: 数字包容, 政策工具, 数字鸿沟, 文本量化分析, 信息弱势群体

Abstract: ith the rapid development of information technology, the construction of digital infrastructure continues to advance, which brings more convenience to people, but also brings the problem of "digital divide". In order to promote the digital equality of information vulnerable groups, the government has promulgated a number of policies and regulations. In this paper, 103 selected policy documents related to digital inclusion are used as research samples, and policy tools are used as research theory and basis to code, count and analyze the content of the research samples. The results show that China's digital inclusion related policies have some shortcomings, such as policy operability to be enhanced, overuse of environmental policy tools, structural imbalance between supply-demand policy tools, and poor foresight of digital inclusion policies. Based on these findings, the paper puts forward some suggestions, such as improving policy implementation rules, optimizing the structure of policy tools, and establishing a collaborative governance policy system, to provide reference for future policy-making.

Key words: Digital inclusion, Policy tools, Digital divide, Text quantitative analysis, Information vulnerable groups

中图分类号: