信息资源管理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (5): 49-59.doi: 10.13365/j.jirm.2021.05.049

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

公共信息系统发展决策的同伴影响研究——以我国市级政府开放数据网站为例

曹树金 闫欣阳   

  1. 中山大学信息管理学院,广州,510006
  • 出版日期:2021-09-26 发布日期:2021-11-11
  • 作者简介:曹树金(通讯作者),博士,教授,博导,研究方向为信息组织与信息检索、网络信息管理等,Email:caosj@mail.sysu.edu.cn;闫欣阳,硕士生,研究方向为信息组织。

Peer Influence on Public Information System Development Decisions: Taking the Municipal OGD Platforms in China as an Example

Cao Shujin Yan Xinyang   

  1. School of Information Management, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510006
  • Online:2021-09-26 Published:2021-11-11

摘要: 探讨政府在开放数据发展方面如何利用参照组来做决策,明确政府开放数据网站发展受同伴影响的方向性。通过揭示同伴影响的复杂动态,丰富制度环境和信息系统发展的研究,为我国政府开放数据发展提供参考。以前景理论和制度理论为基础提出假设,参考前人研究的模型进行开放数据得分等数据收集和假设验证。市级政府在面对特征参照组时开放数据发展方向倾向于中庸, 而面对制度参照组时,调整则变得激进。两个参照组起不同的调节作用,促使政府动态调整其开放数据的发展方向。但开放数据水平发展到一定阶段后,政府应逐步摒弃“中庸之道”,着重提高政府数据开放的核心能力。

关键词: 公共信息系统, 同伴影响, 政府开放数据, 参照组, 决策因素, 前景理论, 制度理论

Abstract: This paper mainly discusses how governments make decisions by using reference groups in the development of open data, and makes clear the direction of the development of open data website influenced by peers. By revealing the complex dynamics of peer influence, research on the development of institutional environment and information system can be enriched, and references for the development of open data of Chinese government are also provided. Hypotheses are proposed based on prospect theory and institutional theory, and data collection and hypothesis verification are conducted based on previous research models. It is concluded that municipal governments tend to take the principle "doctrine of the mean" to direct the development of OGD platforms when facing the trait-based reference group, while it will take the radical route when facing the institution-based reference group. The two reference groups play different regulatory roles, prompting the government to dynamically adjust the development direction of OGD. However when open data has developed to a certain stage, the government should gradually abandon the golden mean, and focuses on improving the core capabilities of government data openness.

Key words: Public information system, Peer influence, Open government data, Reference group, Decision factor, Prospect theory, Institution theory