信息资源管理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3): 6-22.doi: 10.13365/j.jirm.2023.03.006

• 问卷调查与结构方程模型 • 上一篇    下一篇

结构方程模型的应用准则:CB-SEM和PLS-SEM研究范式的比较与启示

袁野1 萧文龙2 于媛3 王刊良4 李一然5   

  1. 1.杭州科技职业技术学院,杭州,311402; 
    2.台湾长庚大学管理学院,桃园,33302; 
    3.武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉,430072; 
    4.中国人民大学商学院,北京,100872; 
    5.福州大学经济与管理学院,福州,350108
  • 出版日期:2023-05-26 发布日期:2023-06-08
  • 作者简介:袁野,博士,讲师,研究方向为金融科技、电子商务;萧文龙,博士,教授,研究方向为核心知识、电子商务、结构方程模型、混合方法;于媛,博士,编辑,研究方向为开放存取,政府信息资源管理;王刊良,博士,教授,研究方向为信息系统用户行为、数字化助推;李一然(通讯作者),博士,讲师,研究方向为在线用户行为、认知神经科学、数据挖掘与商务智能,Email: yiran_li94@sina.com。

Criteria of Structural Equation Modeling: Comparisons and Enlightenments of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM

Yuan Ye1 Shiau Wenlung2 Yu Yuan3 Wang Kanliang4 Li Yiran5   

  1. 1.Hangzhou Polytechnic, Hangzhou, 311402; 
    2.College of Management, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, 33302; 
    3.School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072; 
    4.Business School, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872; 
    5.School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, 310023
  • Online:2023-05-26 Published:2023-06-08

摘要: 结构方程模型(SEM)用于分析观察变量和潜在变量之间复杂的相互关系,分为基于协方差的结构方程模型(CB-SEM)和基于方差的偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)两类。结构方程模型在组织管理、信息系统、营销管理等社会科学学科和其他学科中应用广泛,特别是使用偏最小二乘结构方程模型方法的论文数量近年来稳步提升。CB-SEM和PLS-SEM在算法上和应用上有很大不同,选择不适合的方法可能导致研究结果不准确,因此,了解这两种方法的区别和报告指南十分必要。本文梳理了结构方程模型中CB-SEM和PLS-SEM方法的使用条件和适用情境,并以财富管理企业使用金融科技为例,比较了两种方法的分析过程和分析结果,强调了选择合适方法的重要性和必要性,为研究者们使用结构方程模型进行准确的数据分析提供了有价值的参考。

关键词: 结构方程模型, CB-SEM, PLS-SEM, 数据分析, 方法比较

Abstract: Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is used to analyze the complex relationships between observed variables and latent variables. Covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) are the two types of SEM. SEM has been widely used in social science such as organizational management, information systems, marketing management and other disciplines. In recent years the number of research papers using PLS-SEM method has increased. Since CB-SEM and PLS-SEM are different in algorithm and requirements, the application of unsuitable methods may lead to inaccurate results. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the differences between the two methods and report guidelines. This paper reviews the conditions and application criteria of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM, and takes the use of fintech by wealth management enterprises as an example to compare the analysis process and results of the two methods, emphasizing the importance and necessity of choosing appropriate methods. This paper provides a valuable reference for researchers to use SEM for accurate data analysis.

Key words: Structural Equation Modeling(SEM), CB-SEM, PLS-SEM, Data analysis, Comparison of methods

中图分类号: