信息资源管理学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3): 4-11.doi: 10.13365/j.jirm.2018.03.004

• 专稿 •    下一篇

学术评价相关问题与思考

苏新宁 王东波   

  • 收稿日期:2018-06-10 出版日期:2018-07-26 发布日期:2018-07-26
  • 作者简介:苏新宁,教授,研究方向为信息智能处理与检索、信息分析与科学评价,Email:xnsu@nju.edu.cn;王东波,副教授,研究方向为数据挖掘与信息计量。
  • 基金资助:

    本文系国家社科基金特别委托项目“国家社科基金项目成果学术影响力评估”(第二期)(16@ZH081 2016.12-2019.01)的研究成果之一。

Related Questions and Thoughts of Academic Evaluation

Su Xinning Wang Dongbo   

  • Received:2018-06-10 Online:2018-07-26 Published:2018-07-26

摘要:

随着大数据和人工智能的发展,学术评价的对象以及学术评价的深度和广度都发生了重大的变化。在这一背景下,本文对学术评价的现状和未来的发展趋势进行了探究,在总结了学术评价相应的研究基础上,对学术评价以刊评文、唯期刊马首是瞻、过度量化、唯数字是从和影响因子至上、唯排名是举等现状进行了概括。在目前学术评价研究的基础上,从学术评价应强调发现学术规律,重点关注未来科学发展,淡化数量考察、强调成果质量、水平和创新,跳出以刊评文和排行榜的羁绊,强化中国科技期刊强国战略等五个维度上对学术评价未来的发展趋势进行了深入思考。

关键词: 学术评价, 学术乱象, 学术规律, 学术不端, 期刊强国

Abstract:

The objects of academic evaluation as well as the depth and breadth of academic evaluation have changed greatly with the development of big data and artificial intelligence. The current situation and future development trend of academic evaluation are explored in this setting. The current situations of academic evaluation is summarized which cover evaluating journal instead of paper, overquantifying and highly praising influence factor on the basis of summarizing the corresponding research of academic evaluation. The five dimensions of academic evaluation of the future trend is analyzed which include discovering academic rules, focusing on the future of science, emphasizing the quality, level and innovation of result, getting out of the fetter of evaluating the paper based on the journal and ranking list, and strengthening the strategy of enhancing the China's science and technology journals.

Key words: Academic evaluation, Academic chaos, Academic rule, Academic misconduct, Strengthening the country by journal

中图分类号: