信息资源管理学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (2): 63-71.doi: 10.13365/j.jirm.2016.02.063

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

文档内可视化分析工具的比较研究

陆泉 赵琴 陈静   

  • 收稿日期:2015-12-06 出版日期:2016-04-26 发布日期:2016-04-26
  • 作者简介:陆泉,男,副教授,研究方向为信息可视化,数据挖掘等;赵琴,女,研究生,研究方向为信息用户研究;陈静,女,副教授,研究方向为信息组织与信息检索。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家自然科学基金项目“图像信息资源可视化协同语义标注及实现研究”(71273195)和“图书层次主题自动标引研究”(71303089)的成果之一。

A Comparative Study on Within-Document Visualization Analysis Tools

Lu Quan Zhao Qin Chen Jing   

  • Received:2015-12-06 Online:2016-04-26 Published:2016-04-26

摘要: 文章对现有文档内可视化分析工具进行梳理,根据可视化对象差异将工具分为基于文档内词汇分布的可视化、基于文档内语义结构的可视化、基于文档内主题内容的可视化共三种类型;然后从适用文档、文本分析方法、可视化形式、可视化对象、交互方式、优势、局限性等方面对其中12种典型工具进行详细分析和比较,并由此总结归纳出三类工具的特点、差异性和共性;最后对现有文档内可视化分析工具的发展提出几点建议,以期为相关研究人员提供参考。

关键词: 文档内可视化,  词汇分布,  语义结构,  主题,  比较研究

Abstract: This paper combs the existing within-document visualization analysis tools. According to the differences of visual objects, these tools are divided into three types, based on within-document lexical distribution visualization, based on within-document semantic structure visualization, and based on within-document topic visualization. Then twelve kinds of typical tools are analyzed in detail and compared from the applicable documents, text analysis method, visual representation, visual object, interaction, advantages, limitations and other aspects. And thus this paper summarizes the characteristics of three types of tools, the differences and similarities. Finally, some suggestions for the development of the existing within-document visualization analysis tools are proposed, which aim to provide reference for researchers.

Key words: Within-document visualization,  Lexical distribution,  Semantic structure,  Topic,  Comparative study

中图分类号: