信息资源管理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (1): 44-54.doi: 10.13365/j.jirm.2024.01.044

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

失真健康信息预先干预对个体感知与行为意愿影响的实证研究

李新月1 宋士杰2,3 韩文婷4 赵宇翔1,5 朱庆华1   

  1. 1.南京大学信息管理学院,南京,210023; 
    2.河海大学商学院,南京,211106; 
    3.武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉,430072;
    4.山东财经大学管理科学与工程学院,济南,250014; 
    5.南京大学数据智能与交叉创新实验室,南京,210023
  • 出版日期:2024-01-26 发布日期:2024-02-27
  • 作者简介:李新月,博士生,研究方向为健康信息学;宋士杰(通讯作者),副教授,博士后,研究方向为健康信息学,Email:ssong@hhu.edu.cn;韩文婷,讲师,研究方向为健康信息行为;赵宇翔,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为健康信息管理、数字人文与媒介创新;朱庆华,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为健康信息学,信息资源管理。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家自然科学基金面上项目“社交媒体环境下失真健康信息的传播机制与协同治理研究”(72174083)、国家自然科学基金青年项目“社交媒体失真健康信息的特征识别与协同纠偏机制研究”(72204076)的研究成果之一。

An Empirical Study of the Effects of a Prebunking of Health Misinformation on Individuals’ Perceptions and Behavioral Intentions

Li Xinyue1 Song Shijie2,3 Han Wenting4 Zhao Yuxiang1,5 Zhu Qinghua1   

  1. 1.School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023; 
    2.School of Business, Hohai University, Nanjing, 211106; 
    3.School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072; 
    4.School of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan, 250014; 
    5.Laboratory for Data Intelligence and Cross-Innovation of Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023
  • Online:2024-01-26 Published:2024-02-27

摘要: 本研究旨在分析预先干预对个体感知与行为意愿两个维度的相关变量的作用机制,并比较不同预先干预方式的效果差异。借助双盲实验法,构建对照组VS.事实接种VS.逻辑接种的组间对照实验,共回收182份有效数据,并通过问卷采集用户感知与行为意愿数据。通过单因素方差分析检验预先干预的影响机制,以及多重比较分析不同干预方式的作用效果。研究结果表明,失真健康信息的预先干预对个体感知和行为意愿有显著影响。在感知维度,预先干预能够显著降低个体的感知威胁、失真健康信息的感知共识、感知可信度;在行为维度,预先干预能够有效降低个体的失真健康信息分享意愿,但对新冠疫苗的接种意愿影响不大。此外,事实接种与逻辑接种的作用效果无显著差异。本研究拓展了预先干预的应用场景与作用机制,可为确定预先干预在失真健康信息治理中的可行性与有效性提供依据。

关键词: 失真健康信息, 预先干预, 信息疫情, 个体感知, 行为意愿, 预防接种理论

Abstract: This study aims to analyze the mechanisms of prebunking’s impact on two specific dimensions (i.e., individual perception and behavioral intention) and compare the efficacy of different prebunking strategies. The hypotheses were tested in a double-blind experimental design, wherein 182 participants were randomly assigned to a fact-based inoculation or a logic-based inoculation or a control group. Specifically, we use one-way ANOVA to test the mechanism of the effect of the pre-intervention and use multiple comparison analysis to test the effect of different interventions. The results indicate that prebunking have a significant impact on individual perceptions and behavioral intentions. In the perception dimension, prebunking substantially reduces individuals' perceived threat, perceived consensus, and perceived credibility of health misinformation. In the behavioral intention dimension, while prebunking effectively reduces individuals' sharing likelihood of health misinformation, it has little impact on their willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between the group of fact-based and logic-based inoculations. This study broadens the application scenarios and mechanisms of prebunking, offering evidence for assessing its feasibility and efficacy in the governance of health misinformation.

Key words: Health misinformation, Prebunking, Infodemics, Individual perceptions, Behavioral intention, Inoculation theory

中图分类号: