信息资源管理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (6): 48-61.doi: 10.13365/j.jirm.2023.06.048

• 专题·国家数据局成立契机下数据主权规则谱系与治理机制研究(2) • 上一篇    下一篇

基于数据主权视角的算法治理:进展、困境与路径

马腾飞1,2   

  1. 1.中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京,100088; 
    2.公安部第一研究所,北京,100048
  • 出版日期:2023-11-26 发布日期:2023-12-28
  • 作者简介:马腾飞,博士生,律师,研究方向为知识产权、数据安全,Email:matengfei@anicert.cn 。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金重大项目“大数据主权安全保障体系建设研究”(21&ZD169)、政府治理能力大数据应用技术国家工程实验室2017—2018年度开放基金项目“面向网络主权战略的政府大数据治理机制研究”的研究成果之一。

Algorithmic Governance from the Perspective of Data Sovereignty: Challenges, Progress and Approaches

Ma Tengfei   

  1. 1.Civil, Commercial and Economic Law School, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, 100088; 
    2.First Research Institute of the Ministry of Public Security of PRC, Beijing, 100048
  • Online:2023-11-26 Published:2023-12-28

摘要: 主权视角下,算法治理面临着“数据主权”与“算法权力”的博弈、平台国家化和国家平台化的冲击以及先行治理方案缺失与时滞的核心挑战。在应对挑战的过程中,各主权国家形成差异化治理进路,包括美国以多方问责为核心、风险应对的主动模式,欧盟以数据保护为基础、辅以问责的防御模式,以及我国以总体国家安全观为原则的系统性尝试。借鉴国际治理经验,本文提出我国主权视角下算法治理的发展进路,包括治理原则上注重均衡发展与安全,以人为本作为算法治理根本红线;治理主体上注重“治理侧”改革,多元共治应对算法风险;治理对象上侧重“供给侧”改革,健全平台与技术治理方案;治理方法上,进一步完善分级分类体系,并与场景治理结合。

关键词: 算法治理, 数据主权, 算法权力, 算法风险, 平台责任, 总体国家安全观

Abstract: From the perspective of data sovereignty, algorithmic governance is challenged by the interplay between "data sovereignty" and "algorithmic power", the impact of nationalization of platforms and national platforms, and the core challenges of lack of prior governance solutions and time lag. In the process of tackling the challenges, various sovereign states have developed different governance approaches, including the proactive model of the United States, which focuses on multi-party accountability and risk response, the defensive model of the European Union, which is based on data protection with an emphasis on accountability, and the systematic attempt of China, which is based on the principle of overall national security. Drawing from international governance experiences, this paper proposes a development path for algorithmic governance from the perspective of data sovereignty of China,which includes the following key aspects: Firstly, regarding the governance principles, it emphasizes the need for a balance between development and security, advocating the "people-oriented" principle as the bedrocks of algorithmic governance. Secondly, regarding the governance agents, it stresses the importance of "governance-side" reform, calling for a collaborative, multi-stakehdder approach to mitigate algorithmic risk. Thirdly, regarding the govemance subjects, it highlights the criticality of "supply-side" reform, focusing on the enhancement of governance structures for both platforms and technologies. Lastly, regarding the governance methods, it promotes the advancement of a tiered classification system, which should be adeptly integrated with scenario-specific governance.

Key words: Algorithmic governance, Data sovereignty, Algorithmic power, Algorithmic risk, Platform responsibility, Overall national security

中图分类号: