信息资源管理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3): 110-120.doi: 10.13365/j.jirm.2021.03.110

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

性别视角下国家自然科学基金项目负责人的成果产出与影响研究

张琳1,2 杜会英1 尚媛媛2 黄颖2   

  1. 1.华北水利水电大学管理与经济学院, 郑州,450046; 
    2.武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉,430072
  • 出版日期:2021-05-26 发布日期:2021-06-23
  • 作者简介:张琳,博士,教授,研究方向:科学计量学与科技管理;杜会英,硕士生,研究方向:科技创新与知识管理;尚媛媛,博士生,研究方向:科学计量学与科技管理;黄颖(通讯作者),博士,副教授,研究方向:科技计量学和科技管理,Email:ying.huang@whu.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    本研究系国家自然科学基金面上项目“科研人员职业生涯的性别差异和影响机理研究:合作、流动与学术表现”(71974150)研究成果之一。

Gender Differences in Academic Performance and Impact: An Analysis of the NSFC Project Principal Investigator

Zhang Lin1,2 Du Huiying1 Shang Yuanyuan2 Huang Ying2   

  1. 1.School of Management and Economics, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, 450046; 
    2.School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072
  • Online:2021-05-26 Published:2021-06-23

摘要: 从性别视角分析科学基金负责人受到项目资助后的成果产出与影响,可为项目绩效评价和科研人员性别差异提供新的研究视角与政策启示。本研究基于2017年结项的国家自然科学基金管理科学部面上项目与青年科学基金项目的项目负责人信息,收集这些项目负责人的论文成果及其影响力信息,应用数理统计和文献计量学方法探究负责人在成果产出与影响力方面的性别差异。分析发现:①从成果产出角度来看,女性项目负责人的论文合著规模较大、国际化程度较高;男性项目负责人的研究得到了更多项目的资助,而女性项目负责人的研究主要受其主持的自科基金项目资助。②从成果影响力角度来看,男性项目负责人产出项目论文成果的学术影响力更高且Mendeley受众较多,而女性项目负责人的产出项目论文成果在社交媒体传播更为广泛。本研究相对全面地呈现了不同性别项目负责人的成果产出与影响特征,有助于科技管理部门把握不同性别科研人员的共性与差异以制定更有效的针对性政策。

关键词: 性别差异, 科学基金, 项目负责人, 学术表现, 网络社会影响力, 学术评价

Abstract: Analyzing the gender differences in the academic performance of the scientific funding’s project principle investigators is of great importance for extending relevant research perspectives and future formulation of policy on researchers’ evaluation. Taking the principle investigators in Management Science granted by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) in 2017 as research objects, we investigate the gender differences in research productivity and impact with the data of funded publications and resume information of principal investigators. The results indicate that: 1) from the perspective of papers' characteristics: the number of coauthors and the degree of internationalization of female principal investigators are significantly higher than those of males. The male principal investigators’ outputs have more diversified funding from other sources, while the publications of females are mostly funded by their own funding. 2) From the perspective of the papers’ impact, the academic impact of male project leaders is higher than those of females, and the number of Mendeley audiences is also larger than their female colleagues’. However, it is notable that female project leaders attract more social media attention. This study provides a relatively comprehensive comparative analysis of the academic performance between female and male project principal investigators, which might provide a better understanding of the characteristics between researchers of different genders for policymakers and further help them formulate targeted policies to promote the S&T innovation and social development.

Key words: Gender differences, Scientific funding, Project leaders, Academic performance, Social impact, Academic evaluation

中图分类号: