信息资源管理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3): 99-109.doi: 10.13365/j.jirm.2021.03.099

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

政策工具视角下的我国网络安全政策内容量化分析——基于2015—2020年的国家政策文本

张晨芳1 夏志杰1 王诣铭2   

  1. 1.上海工程技术大学管理学院,上海,201600; 
    2.上海财经大学信息管理与工程学院,上海,200433
  • 出版日期:2021-05-26 发布日期:2021-06-23
  • 作者简介:张晨芳,硕士生,研究方向为信息管理与信息系统;夏志杰(通讯作者),博士,教授,研究方向为信息管理与信息系统,Email:xia_zhijie@163.com;王诣铭,博士生,研究方向为信息管理与信息系统。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系上海市软科学研究计划项目重点课题“大数据提升上海政府决策能力的创新思路研究”(18692107200)的研究成果之一。

Quantitative Analysis of Chinese Network Security Text from the Perspective of Policy Tools

Zhang Chenfang1 Xia Zhijie1 Wang Yiming2   

  1. 1.School of Management, Shanghai University of Engineering Science,Shanghai,201600; 
    2.School of Information Management and Engineering, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai,200433
  • Online:2021-05-26 Published:2021-06-23

摘要: 随着“新基建”“智慧城市”的建设,网络安全问题越来越重要,研究我国网络安全政策文本,对认清我国网络安全政策现状,促进网络安全防护管理体系建设十分必要。以2015—2020年的25份国家层面网络安全政策文本为样本,构建政策工具与危机生命周期的二维分析框架,采用政策内容量化的方法对文本进行分析。研究发现,我国网络安全政策与网络安全实践息息相关,供给型政策工具使用占比高达61.22%,环境型政策工具内部结构明显不均衡,其中法规管制使用占比高,金融税收政策空白,需求型政策工具使用占比较低,并且政策工具多集中于危机前阶段,危机中的应对与危机后的评估重建等内容涉及较少。这需要认清网络安全政策与实践发展之间的关系,根据网络安全发展状况,统筹供给型、环境型与需求型政策工具的运用,重视危机生命周期各阶段政策工具的协调性,对缺位政策工具进行合理补位,以保障我国网络安全。

关键词: 网络安全, 政策工具, 危机生命周期, 政策内容, 量化分析

Abstract: Under the background of building new infrastructure and smart city, there is no doubt that enough concern must be paid to the problem of network security. Studying the texts of China's network security policy is very necessary for recognizing the current situation of China's network security policy and promoting the construction of network security protection management system. Taking 25 national cyber security policy texts from 2015 to 2020 as samples, this paper constructs a two-dimension analysis framework of policy tools and crisis life cycle, and the texts were analyzed by quantitative method of policy content. Studies have found that China's network security policy is related to network security practice, the usage of supply-oriented policy tools is as high as 61.22%, while the internal structure of environment-oriented policy tools is obvious imbalance, with high usage of laws and regulations, but none of financial tax policy; and the use of demand-oriented policy tools is low. It is also found that policy tools focus more on the pre-crisis stage, but involve less on crisis response and post-crisis reconstruction assessment. It requires clearly understanding the relationship between cyber security policy and practical development. According to the development of cyber security, we should coordinate the application of supply-oriented, environment-oriented, and demand-oriented policy tools, attach more importance to the coordination of policy tools at all stages of the crisis life cycle, and reasonably supplement the absent policy tools to ensure China's cyber security.

Key words: Network security, Policy tools, Crisis life cycle, Policy content, Quantitative analysis

中图分类号: