信息资源管理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (5): 66-75.doi: 10.13365/j.jirm.2020.05.066

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

隐私悖论研究述评及未来展望

罗映宇1 韦志颖2 孙 锐2   

  1. 1.湖南大学工商管理学院,长沙,41000;
    2.华侨大学工商管理学院,泉州,362000
  • 出版日期:2020-09-26 发布日期:2020-10-14
  • 作者简介:罗映宇,博士研究生,研究方向为神经营销学;韦志颖,硕士研究生,研究方向为神经营销学;孙锐(通讯作者),教授,博士生导师,研究方向为知识管理,神经营销学,Email:15880918120@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系华侨大学研究生科研创新能力培育计划项目(17013121006)。

Review of Privacy Paradox Research and Future Prospects

Luo Yingyu1 Wei Zhiying2 Sun Rui2   

  1. 1.Business School of Hunan University,Changsha,410000;
    2.Huaqiao University School of Business Administration,Quanzhou,362000
  • Online:2020-09-26 Published:2020-10-14

摘要: 近年来,隐私悖论已成为管理学、情报学等领域的热点话题,但是目前学术界仍缺乏系统性的认识和指导,严重制约了隐私悖论研究的发展。本研究通过回顾和梳理近年来的研究成果,从隐私计算、有限理性、社会理论、解释水平和量子力学五个方面对隐私悖论的研究成果进行归纳和探讨,提出当前研究存在争议的三大原因:定义模糊、方法失位、群体受限,并对未来隐私悖论的研究方向进行展望,以期为学者进一步的研究提供参考。

关键词: 隐私悖论, 隐私关注, 隐私态度, 隐私计算

Abstract: In recent years, privacy paradox has become a hot topic in management, information science and other fields, but the current academic community still lacks systematic understanding and guidance, which seriously restricts the development of privacy research. By reviewing and combing the research results in recent years, this paper summarizes and discusses the research results of privacy paradox from five aspects: privacy calculus, bounded rationality, social theory, construct level and quantum theory, and proposes three major controversies in current research: definition ambiguity, method misplacement, group restriction. It prospects for the future research direction of privacy paradox, in order to provide reference for further research.

Key words: Privacy paradox, Privacy concern, Privacy attitude, Privacy calculation

中图分类号: